Lone Turtle Illustration Logo Critique 3
Categories: CritiquesMarketing & Design
Lone Turtle Illustration Logo Critique
Ron submitted his logo for Lone Turtle Illustration. He left the following commentary about his logo.
The image of a turtle howling against the backdrop of a full moon is intended to express the humour that is at the core of what I do. The same is true for the name: Lone Turtle. The font (Wanted LETTS) mimics the stereotypical Wild West typography.
The following critique is based on one designers opinion and experience. I always appreciate the readers thoughts as well. So, Ill ask a question of two in the critique, please share your perspective in the comments at the end of this logo design critique.
Design Principals
Certainly a turtle howling at moon is comical and hints at your personality and style. As I have written before, a good logo should be a visual expression of the company it represents (See: What Makes a Great Logo Design). However, I do have some issues with the execution. First, the turtle is the most important part of mark since it sells the concept, yet its the smallest. I think it needs to be the focus of the illustration instead of the large brown rock. Second, color selection is somewhat dull and uninviting, it squashes some of the humor of the mark. Perhaps some more contrast in the palette may help. Ive included a couple old western movie posters below that a bit more lively and have more contrast in their color palettes.

Finally, the type appears to be wedged into the rock without any room to breathe. Removing the type from rock will allow some more air around it and will take some of the visual emphasis off the rock shape.
Question for the readers
please respond in the comments below
Do you like the comical direction of the mark and business name? Would you agree that the turtle should have more emphasis?
Functionality / Versatility
Another drop shadow... Generally drop shadows are a bad idea for logos, this one included. Its not enhancing the logo in any way and makes for all sorts of problems in reproduction. Sure it works fine on the web, but how about embroidered on a shirt, foil stamped on a notebook or on your office door? It can be argued that there are ways to make it work, but why even bother when its not enhancing the design.
Does the Logo Work for the Audience?
I think the logo lets your current and potential clients know right away who they are dealing with and what they can expect when working with you.
Uniqueness
I cant say I ever come across a logo of a turtle howling at the moon. Definitely unique. The great thing is that its not unique for no reason. As mentioned before it fits your personality and the style of work you do. So great job at capturing that in your logo.
Typography
I think the typography is one of the biggest weak points in this logo. It feels squished into the rock shape with little breathing room. Theres nothing wrong with choosing a typeface that reflects the old western theme of the mark, but maybe the type doesnt need to be squished into the rock. It could easily work below or beside the illustration.
Possible Improvements
Designing a logo for yourself or own business is one of the hardest logo designs youll ever work on. So what is the best way to improve the logo? Well I think have made some comments above that can certainly offer some direction. Heres a list of actionable items.
- Consider reworking the illustration to make the turtle a more prominent figure in the mark.
- Experiment with the colors, dont abandon the stuff that makes it feel like an old western, but bring in some contrast and maybe a little more saturation to some of the colors.
- Rework the typography. It doesnt have to be placed within the rock shape.
Overall, I think you have a good start on the logo design. And with some refinement you can definitely improve it. Please know that my intention in critiquing your work is not to hurt feelings, but to offer constructive feedback. I hope it was helpful. Best of luck, to you!
I appreciate and welcome your comments, and look forward to hearing from you soon. I purposely dont cover every possible improvement that can be made to this logo, so go for it if you think I missed anything. All I ask is that you keep your comments clean and appropriate.
Like what you read here? Subscribe to the Logo Critiques News Feed.
Enjoy this post? Share it with others.
The images & logos presented on this blog are copyrighted by their respective owners. The blog itself is copyright Erik Peterson, 2008-2010 All Rights Reserved.








We enjoy your comments
3 Comments so far. Keep 'em Coming.
#1
By Larkef
07.16.2009 at 07:30 AM
I have the feeling this logo would work well in just black and white. This would make it easier to remember and it would simplify it as a whole.
Good luck!
#2
By Ron Tocknell
07.18.2009 at 02:18 PM
Certainly no hurt feelings, Erik. I submitted it to check where it could be improved, not to be told it’s lovely… we have mothers for that :o)
Thanks Erik and Larkef. Actually I do use a black silhouette on white for print & the Tee shirt design doesn’t have the drop shadow. The shadow is only for web display.
Points taken and I’ll work out some variations, taking you review into account.
Ron
#3
By kiman
08.23.2009 at 03:39 PM
I think logo may be more simply